Marketing

Startups Must Focus Their Initial Use Case

As a founder of a hardware or software platform with potential applications across many markets, it’s natural to want to showcase your solution’s broad capabilities to investors, customers, partners, and distributors. The cumulative opportunity is indeed massive. However, to successfully raise money and execute effectively, you need to focus on a single use case.

 
 

To capture attention during your pitch, you must identify a clear target market and a compelling pain point that your solution addresses. This is most persuasive when built around one type of customer and related pain points, demonstrating your deep understanding of their specific needs. If you try to cover too many use cases, your pitch risks sounding overly broad and generic.

What is a Use Case?

A use case for a startup company is a specific example of how the company’s product or service will be used by a target customer to solve a particular problem. In essence, it’s a scenario that demonstrates the practical application of the product to fulfill a need, providing a clear picture of its value and relevance in a specific context. For a startup, defining a use case helps clarify the target market, refine the product’s features, and strengthen the pitch to investors and stakeholders. The main elements include:

  1. Target Customer: The specific type of customer or user that the startup’s product is designed to serve. This includes demographic or business profile details such as industry, size, or role within a company.

  2. Pain Point or Problem: A clear description of the challenge or problem the target customer faces, which the product or service addresses. This should be a real, pressing issue that the customer needs to solve.

  3. Solution: A concise explanation of how the startup’s product or service directly addresses the pain point or problem, highlighting unique features or capabilities.

  4. Value Proposition: The main benefit the customer will gain from using the product or service. This could be cost savings, time efficiency, quality improvement, or other specific advantages.

  5. Customer Needs and Expectations: Any specific requirements the customer has for the solution to be successful, such as ease of use, compatibility, reliability, or particular features.

  6. Competitive Advantage: How the startup’s solution is superior to alternatives on the market, outlining unique aspects that make it the best fit for this use case.

  7. Metrics for Success: Quantifiable outcomes that indicate the success of the solution for this use case. Examples might include reduction in time, increase in productivity, customer satisfaction scores, or cost savings.

  8. Example Scenario (Optional): A hypothetical narrative that walks through the steps a target customer would take to use the product in their day-to-day operations. This scenario brings the use case to life and helps investors or stakeholders visualize the solution in action.

Benefits of a Single Use Case

Focusing on a single use case allows you to tell a stronger story, and although it may be challenging to choose one path, doing so provides you and your team with clarity and impact. Here are the reasons why homing in on one use case is crucial:

  1. Enhanced Pitch Clarity: When you target a single market with a single pain point, you can vividly bring that issue to life. Multiple pain points dilute the message and can confuse your audience. It can be too abstract rather than specific.

  2. Focused Product Development. Startups often try to build too big of an initial product, which costs more money, uses more resources, takes more time, and introduces more complications. Focusing on a target use case can simplify and speed the process.

  3. Technical Feasibility: Different use cases often demand unique adaptations, whether specialized libraries, data sets, interfaces, or compatibility requirements. Attempting a one-size-fits-all solution risks creating an unwieldy product that serves no market well.

  4. Aligned Value Proposition: Each market may prioritize different aspects of your platform, ranging from cost to precision. Trying to convey multiple value propositions weakens your message and may lead to conflicting perceptions.

  5. Focused Go-to-Market Strategy: Diverse markets often require different sales approaches—consumer direct, major accounts, or distributor-based strategies. Juggling these diverts energy and resources, reducing your effectiveness in any one channel.

  6. Maximizing Impact: It’s better to execute one thing excellently than to struggle with many. Consider it like catching tennis balls: if someone throws you five in quick succession, you can catch each. But if they throw all five at once, you’ll likely end up with only one or even none.

Focusing on a single use case also lets you map specific pain points directly to your value propositions, customer needs, and competitive advantages. This alignment makes for a compelling story, as in this example:

Starting with one use case doesn’t mean ignoring your platform’s full potential. After establishing traction in your initial market, you can introduce your vision for future use cases to show the broader scope of your platform. The broader uses can be one of the last slides in your pitch deck, showing your startup has space to expand.

Criteria for Choosing Your Initial Use Case

Selecting your first use case is a strategic decision and shouldn’t be based solely on market size. Consider these additional factors:

  • Time to First Revenue: Early revenue can fuel growth and attract investment. The ideal market might be one where you have existing relationships, urgent demand, or rapid decision-making cycles.

  • Tolerance for an MVP: Some early users may be more forgiving of a minimum viable product and willing to work through issues, whether with feature gaps, a rougher interface, or stability concerns.

  • Availability of Partnerships: Strong partnerships can ease market entry. If you have industry partners eager to collaborate, this might be your most viable initial path.

  • Access to Grants or Non-Dilutive Funding: Certain use cases may align with funding opportunities, helping to subsidize development without giving up equity.

In the end, this focused approach is about telling a powerful story with a single use case. After gaining traction, you’ll be in a stronger position to expand and convey your broader vision. This is a challenging choice but an essential one for startup success.

Create High-Impact Marketing Materials by First Writing a Marketing Brief

Too many people set up a meeting with a prospective customer or distribution partner, then immediately start to create a PowerPoint (or equivalent) presentation for the event. In many cases they will adapt an earlier version so they can reuse slides and get it done faster. Even though they may feel they are making progress and can check the work off as done, they might be missing an opportunity to really get their message across. In this case Haste Makes Waste.

A PowerPoint, to take one example, might be the least effective way to make the sale. This next meeting might be a one-on-one in an office, rather than the large conference room you created the deck for. This meeting might be at a different stage in the selling cycle, with a buyer who has different questions on her mind. This meeting might be with a company that wants to include other team members in the post-meeting discussion, who might not understand the key messages in a presentation deck. Lots of things may go wrong.

The best approach is first to write a Marketing Brief (sometimes called a Creative Brief), get agreement from your team that it is on-target, and only then create the marketing materials. When you agree on the marketing brief, you can assess the resulting marketing materials by how well they deliver on the brief versus judging them by whether you or anyone else “likes” it. A well-written brief can help the entire team judge the marketing materials objectively.

Read More

Increase Revenues by Applying Basic Pricing Principles

One of the most challenging areas for startups, especially business-to-business companies, is how to price their products or services. Everyone wants to win some early revenues to show investors, but no one wants to leave (too much) money on the table. There is no magic formula for pricing. I have though discovered some principles that can guide the process.

  1. No pricing strategy completely survives the first contact with enterprise customers. There will always be surprises. Price has to make sense to both sides. It is usually best practice to take the winding path to arriving at a price, rather than putting a price on the table right up front. It can help to do trial closes with different pricing elements, such as asking “if we did this deal do you have a view on what quantity you would purchase in the first year?” or “does your organization prefer to do long-term contracts with ceilings for annual price increases, or do you prefer to renegotiate annual contracts?”

  2. Pricing involves much more than the dollar amount the customer pays. Unlike for consumer goods enterprise sales usually have many more variables to work with, including: volumes, minimum quantities, annual price escalations, level of service provided, customization, integration, payment terms, quality or performance guarantees, and many more.

Read More

Creating the Best Freemium Model

Many subscription services attempt to build their business by offering a Freemium Model, which means offering a free service to basic users while hoping a good share of users will upgrade to a premium plan and start paying for the service. The keys to success for this model are to maximize the conversion rate of customers who will pay, while keeping the free version attractive enough for customers to sample the service.

Companies experience a wide range of conversion rates, from Spotify’s amazing 27% to a more typical range of 1% to 4%. The conversion rate is a big driver of profitability, and finding a way to move from 1% to 2% is doubling the success.

The key is to design the model into the product rather than making it an afterthought. Think hard about how you will give your free users a great experience while educating and tantalizing them about what more they could get by paying the premium.

Read More

Caring for Customers Through the Full Cycle

Most marketers invest much time, thought, and energy in acquistion of customers.  And many (but perhaps too few) pay attention to current customers, especially in recurring-revenue businesses.  But how many even consider how to treat customers as they want to leave, in hopes that a positive experience might make it easier to bring them back in the future?

Think about it.  How many times have you heard the horror stories about customers trying to quit?  How often does that turn a mildly-dissatisfied customer into a raging anti-customer?  I just had an experience trying to quit a music service via an online connection, it took three tries, and it was painful.  There was a rumor several years ago that the only way to quit AOL was to use swear words in a chat room and get kicked off; my one experience with AOL was less extreme but still an unpleasant exit, even during the trial period.

As businesses mature this needs to be a higher concern for marketers.  Holding customers becomes more important than winning new customers.  And having a positive reputation through the entire customer life cycle is even more important.
Read More

Yahoo! Music Unlimited Gets it Right! On the First Try!

I am impressed.  Normally I expect big companies (like Microsoft) to need several releases to get new products and services right.  That is the failure of marketing versus internal politics.

Yahoo! has broken this trend with their release of Yahoo! Music Unlimited.   I have become a fan of subscription music, and have tried most of the new services. Listen, from Rhapsody, was doing a good job for me for awhile. Then today I tried Yahoo! and was amazed at how much they got right on the first try. They have an impressive music catalogue. The use interface makes sense.  They have some good personalization.  And their transfer to other devices is very straight forward, as well as a nice bonus.   Note that I like it without even mentioning the category-killer price of $6.99 /month for pay-as-you go.

 Although I have signed up for the month-by-month service, I already feel I will stick around a while.   Good job Yahoo! marketing and technical teams!
Read More

Five Stages of Marketing “Grief”

I have often referred to the psychologist’s five stages of grief when I have been helping companies understand what might be going wrong with their new product or program launch.

The TLC Group in Dallas has an interesting article on applying the grief stages to other traumatic life events, including an amusing and informative example of dealing with a dead car battery.

With thanks to them, I will apply the same model what I have seen in many companies.

  1. Denial What is the first thing you hear? “The reports must be wrong!” Or “the reporting is missing the real data.”
  2. Anger Once this reality sets in, many companies blame the sales force or channels for failing to get the story out. Or they blame the customers for being stupid. It is usually someone else’s fault.
  3. Bargaining — This can consist of begging the channels or sales force to give it one more shot. Or can involve begging management for more advertising money or more time for the product or program to just catch on.
  4. Depression — In the corporate world, many start to worry about their jobs and look for transfers out of the department. This can be a harsh reality for many people.
  5. Acceptance — OK, so the product or program is a dud. Let’s either shut it down or reinvent it based on what is working well.
In my view, successful companies move through all these stages but do it quickly. They want to give new products and programs a fighting chance, and they also want to stop the bad ones as early as possible.

What about your products and services? What stage are you in?

Read More

Demand the most from your CMO

In my conversations with CEOs and General Managers I hear three consistent themes:

a.                   Top-line growth is vital to the success of the company, now that we are climbing out of the tech recession.

b.                   Companies need to look for new strategies for products, services, alliances, go-to-market approaches, etc.  The business world is different, and same-game strategies are no longer good enough.

c.                    They want their CMOs to step up to the challenges of the full range of strategy, alliances, product/service development, and lead generation.

At the same time, many leaders say their current marketing teams fall short of this set of challenges and they are wondering what to do.  It is possible these companies need to upgrade their marketing leadership and key team members.  But it is also possible that CEOs need to demand the most from their marketing team, and give them the latitude and requirement to take the company to new places.

I will share five starter questions for CEOs to discuss with their marketing team that will open the dialog and quite possibly open the team’s horizons:

1.          “Why exactly do our customers buy from us?”  Many companies are simply happy that their customers are buying, and have lost touch with the real motivations.  In my experience, few executive teams can clearly articulate their value proposition, and instead refer to strings of vague PowerPoint bullet-points that could apply to almost any company.  Those companies that learn what motivates their customers are best positioned to reinforce those attributes, seek other customers who would value those, and reduce wasted investment in unrelated attributes.

2.          “Are we learning everything we can about our customers and how they use our products/services?”  It is amazing to see all the useful customer information that companies “spill on the floor.”  Every point of contact, even to resolve problems, is an opportunity to learn more about the customer.  One leading company set a goal to learn two new things about every customer at every touch point, while avoiding asking the same question twice.  For example, has your telephone company ever asked you whether you use cable or satellite TV services?  Think of how easy that would be for them to do during one of your calls, and how much it would help them market their new services. Harrah’s is a leader in this effort.  Then once you are collecting the data, the question becomes:  “What are we doing to properly use the insights?”

3.          “Do we provide a complete solution for our customers, and if not then what are we missing?”  Many products and services require customers to do some work to create the full solution to meet their needs.  For example, people who buy high-end sound systems often need help setting it up, companies who buy software need to install it and need extra hardware to run it.  Too many technologies are products in search of a market.  If your solution is incomplete, then by what channels and alliances can you complete the solution better than your competitors do?

 4.         “Are we meeting the needs of our customers across their entire lifecycle?”  Many companies are discovering that delivery schedules, customer service, or upgrade ease are proving to be bigger differentiators than the core product/service itself.  The CMO should be responsible for defining the entire customer experience.

5.          “Do we make appropriate use of new media to increase our market impact at lower cost?”  Many realize that the days of mass-media advertising are behind us, and the future lies in narrowcasting, product placements in other media, blogging, podcasting, etc.  Netscape built a leading national brand without spending much, if any, on traditional advertising.  Check whether your marketing department wants a bigger media budget and wants to win a Clio advertising award, or whether they have new experimental ideas for meeting your marketing targets at half the budget.

I encourage CEOs to try these discussions with their marketing groups.  They might be surprised by the response.
Read More

Sell the benefits versus sell the technology

Time and time again we see technology companies use the tech terms to try to sell the technology.  One good example was ISDN; how many remember what that term means?  It failed as a higher-speed access technology for consumers, and partly because of the same mindset that allowed the telcos to call it ISDN.  Similarly, what is iDEN, GPRS, 1xRTT, and other catchy consumer phrases?  Most people do not know.  And they should not care.
We are watching the same trend with VoIP - voice over internet protocol.  Phil Harvey makes mention of a mini-survey of VoIP users who did not even know the term VoIP.  Watch for AOL to figure out how to make this simple and appealing to customers with their recent announcement.  I note that in their press release AOL makes minimal use of the term VoIP.
5:24:01 PM    comment [0]
 
Read More

Once again, it should be about the customer...

While many people tout the success of the iPod, the PlayStation, and other "platforms", it is amazing to see how many companies miss the point -- that it is supposed to be about providing complete solutions for what customers need.
It seems that Sony has missed the mark once again with the PlayStation Portable. I watched them miss with the Mini Disks, which were a superior technology to the Walkman and cassette tapes, but where Sony failed to realize that the Mini Disk should be a computer peripheral rather than a stand-alone entertainment box.
I have yet to try a PlayStation Portable, but Stephen Wildstrom at BusinessWeek provides great insights into the missed functionality and proprietary fences that Sony has built around this product.
They have created a Universal Media Disk (UMD) that are pre-recorded only, are expensive, and lack a support network of titles and inexpensive rentals. They have a limited form of WiFi but prohibit streaming music and video. They failed to allow easy synchronization for song loading. And they support only two music formats -- MP3 and their own ATRAC.
We all need to learn from the successes and failures of others. Sony would be wise to buy Apple, just to get Steve Jobs and his team to show Sony how to create a new product sensation and break down traditional barriers.
Read More

On the 8th P of Marketing, my customer gave to me....

In my time at Accenture, clients would often ask me to list the "4 Ps" of marketing (product, pricing, promotion, and place) to help them organiize a marketing plan or new product introduction plan.  I argue that any marketing plan should address 8 Ps instead, to be complete:
  1. Prospect:  It is so important to know which customers you are targeting, so all the other Ps can align.  This is different than a boil-the-ocean segmentation program.  And it is important to go beyond "there are two types of customers.. those who will buy our product/service and those who won't".
  2. Product/Service:  Describe the major features of the product or service.  Note that I include both products and services because more product companies are getting service components in their business (e.g., warranty and maintenance support) and more service companies are getting into hard products (e.g., telephone companies with DSL modems).
  3. Price:  This one is still important, and it is becoming increasingly important to look at all the "terms" elements of price as part of the equation.  For example, with cellular companies, the set-up charge, phone cost, phone-upgrade flexibility, cancellation charges, etc. are all part of the price equation.
  4. Proposition:  With the first three elements defined, it is essential to define the compelling value proposition for why a target customer will want to buy this products/service versus other options, including doing nothing.  At the planning stage it is critical to push the envelope on the proposition, to apply superlatives as much as possible (fastest, cheapest, easiest, only, etc.)
  5. Place:  The distribution channels are still important, and it is as important to think about the value proposition for the channel partners as it is for the end consumers.
  6. Promotion:  There are more options for promotions today than there were 10 years ago, and wise companies get creative about exploring those.  Seth Godin offers some of the most interesting and compelling ideas on new-age promotion that I have seen.
  7. Process:  It is essential to define the end-to-end, lifetime experience you want your customers to enjoy.  Some marketers leave that to others in the organization, such as the shipping department or the customer service team, but it is up to marketers to define this completely.
  8. Profits:  Marketers are primarily responsible for revenue growth and customer growth, but must also understand the economic levers of the business and demonstrate how they are building the profits of the business over the long run.
Read More